Return to Glynn Simmons


July 19, 1993
Glynn R. Simmons
#90572
P.O. Box 97
McAlester, OK 74502-0097

Dear Glynn:

          I remember your case very well.  I realize the evidence was thin against you.  It was sufficient for a jury to convict you and at the same time had enough holes for a jury to have had a reasonable doubt and acquit you.  Jury trials are a gamble and many are not clear cut.

          Your case has troubled me these many years because of the many questions unanswered by the evidence we had.  This does not mean Glynn that I believe you are innocent or guilty.  I simply do not know.

          You are right that I cannot represent you because of ethical considerations, however, my boss, Bob ravitz, the head Public Defender in Oklahoma County, has volunteered to look into your case.  As I'm sure you're aware, the odds are slim.  I'm also hopeful after all these years and under these circumstances that you will soon receive favorable parole consideration.

 


March 20, 1995
J.D. Daniels
Pardon & Parole Board
4040 N. Lincoln blvd.
Oklahoma City, Okla. 73105

                              RE:  Glynn R. Simmons

Dear Mr. Daniels:

          This letter is to confirm that I wrote the attached letter to Mr. Simmons.  I understand Mr. Hamm at the last meeting on Mr. Simmons did not believe I had written it.  Mr. Hamm is a fine man and a good friend as I grew up in Perry, Oklahoma, however, he was incorrect when he believed I did not write it.  It may have been surprising to him.  I was a prosecutor for approximately 7 years and I have rarely had any contact with the Pardon & Parole Board as a defense attorney. I was the prosecuting attorney on this case.

          In keeping with my statement in the attached letter, that the jury could have gone either way on Mr. Simmons case, it is important to know that: the only witness who identified him at trial when first seeing him in a line-up, wanted to think about his identification overnight;  and the composite (which was never introduced at trial) of the individual that was supposed to be Mr. Simmons was 6 feet something and 200 plus pounds (wearing a hat) a physical description greatly different from Mr. Simmons stature at the time.  The jury on that day at that time found him guilty, however, quite candidly, it was one of the few cases I have been involved in that the verdict a week later could easity have been different.

Original Letters On File For Your Review

Return to Glynn Simmons